Search for: "MCLAREN MACOMB"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 3:35 am
Abruzzo push the limits of McLaren Macomb in her interpretation? [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:00 am
The Board sent shockwaves through employment law in its February 21, 2023, decision in McLaren Macomb, which held that simply offering a draft settlement agreement with broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:29 am
Retroactivity of the McLaren Macomb Decision. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:55 pm
McKeen & Associates announced it filed a case against McLaren Port Huron; Physician Healthcare Network in Fort Gratiot; and Cardiology Associates of Port Huron, for negligence leading to the death of a 54-year-old Macomb County man in the summer of 2018. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On March 22, the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel (GC) issued a memorandum addressing many of the questions that employers were left asking themselves following the Board’s decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
General Counsel Views Scope of Decision in McLaren Macomb Broadly The memorandum offered several broad views of the Board’s decision in McLaren Macomb. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
See McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
” The McLaren Macomb decision is applicable to both union and non-union workplaces. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 8:58 am
On March 22, 2023 Jennifer Abruzzo, General Counsel (“GC”) of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) issued a memorandum intended to assist the Regions in responding to inquiries regarding the Board decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
What Happened in McLaren Macomb The employer operates a hospital with over 2,000 employees. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 11:53 am
NLRB GC memorandum opines on scope of McLaren Macomb decision, in which the Board overturned two decisions that had permitted employers to include confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in severance agreements. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:00 pm
The Background: McLaren Macomb On February 21, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) decided McLaren Macomb, a case where a hospital offered severance pay to eleven permanently furloughed employees in exchange for the employees agreeing to sign a severance agreement. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), holding that not only are most non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses signed by employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”) void as a matter of policy, but merely including one in a proposed severance agreement to an employee violates the Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), holding that not only are most non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses signed by employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”) void as a matter of policy, but merely including one in a proposed severance agreement to an employee violates the Act. [read post]
